Beer o’clock
June 8th, 2007

Why is George drinking, anyway?

Because we’re going to record a new show this weekend!

No, really, stop laughing ![]()
Be sure to tell all your friends!

-Jay
Entry Filed under: Shows
June 8th, 2007

Why is George drinking, anyway?

Because we’re going to record a new show this weekend!

No, really, stop laughing ![]()
Be sure to tell all your friends!

-Jay
Entry Filed under: Shows
18 Comments Add your own
1. MARMPH | June 8th, 2007 at 8:23 pm
wait I thought he only drank O’Duals non-alcoholic?
So we can expect the show by at least monday?
2. MARMPH | June 11th, 2007 at 2:33 pm
Ok so its monaday and still no show. So everyone just drank but didnt record a show.
3. Kayli | June 12th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
Good luck with getting a show done soon!
(I think that they can use the encouragement at this point)
4. Michael | June 27th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
Wow…. it would be great to know if there was a new show coming or if the angry panda show is done.
5. Nordon | June 27th, 2007 at 8:42 pm
Good news: Buckler is essentially non-alcoholic. Bad news: Its half-full of whiskey. Its good to know you guys weren’t gitmoed.
6. Nordon | June 27th, 2007 at 8:50 pm
I saw this in my research- thought it was worth posting. Its off wikipedia.
In the Netherlands, Buckler beer was launched in the summer of 1988. The name Heineken did not appear on the label.[4]
On December 31, 1989, Dutch cabaret performer Youp van ‘t Hek negatively referred to Buckler beer several times during his New Year cabaret show, also with the words: “You know Buckler, don’t you? The orthodox reformed beer. I hate them incredibly, Buckler drinkers. Yuck. Those types standing next to you in a bar that don’t get drunk.”[5] His show resulted in a new concept, the ‘Buckler loser’ (Dutch: Bucklerlul), which led to dropping sales and eventually taking the beer out of the Dutch market. The estimated loss for Heineken was Æ’400,000,000. Heineken did not sue Youp van ‘t Hek, responding that they themselves also use humour in their campaigns and that they should be able to deal with it themselves too.[6]
7. dave | July 3rd, 2007 at 1:34 pm
hey freaks, make a new show. commies
8. MARMPH | July 4th, 2007 at 7:20 pm
I can’t believe Merkel didnt bring out the good stuff. Any news on the next so, its been awile.
9. MARMPH | July 14th, 2007 at 6:56 pm
Hello is anyone there, or is everyone dead?
10. Kayli | July 23rd, 2007 at 7:21 pm
Alright Jay….time to get it together and get a show done. This is nuts and Fred tells me that it’s your fault.
And if that’s not motivation enough…if you do the show I’ll send you saucy pictures:P
11. MARMPH | July 24th, 2007 at 11:05 pm
Then maybe he wont need cocktail napkins anymore.
Anyway enough blaming Fred, please do another show, I’m realy getting tired of having to watch 25 minutes of “The Worlds New Ugliest Dog” crap in order to hear 5 minutes of real news. And if it helps we can all stop blaming Fred and Jay and blame that 4th guy, that subsituted for Olivia, that no realy liked. No offence but we (I) prefered Olivia.
12. Michael | September 9th, 2007 at 11:45 am
Any updates guys? Its been 6-months!!!!
13. MARMPH | September 16th, 2007 at 1:03 pm
Hey what ever happened to all the August comments, where Jay was talking about sunday recordings and actualy getting off his ass and doing something? And where we all agreed it was all Matt’s fualt, anyone remember that?
14. dave | October 2nd, 2007 at 1:47 pm
make another fucking show, bitches!
15. Rob Y | December 21st, 2007 at 4:06 am
Is this podcast gone? Can’t download it from itunes, can’t download from the site….wth? Updates anyone?
16. dave | February 12th, 2008 at 3:22 am
you guys suck balls. make a show for the love of god!
17. olivia | February 29th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
talk to jay and fred. i’m ready.
18. Nordon | March 7th, 2008 at 12:40 am
You talk to them, we’ve tried. You can at least get to Fred, we know he never reads this shit.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed